Video Lectures to Assist Students During Workshop


I have finally begun a video lecture series that my students can reference as they write, work, and study.

I attended Andrew Easton’s (@EastonA1) 2017 NCTE session on “Genre Exploration through Immersive Game Units.” At the time, I was gamifying my classroom and his presentation was inspiring. However, the piece I most connected with was short video-recorded lessons to help in personalized learning. I knew I at least needed to have video lessons for students to refer back to. Also in the past two years, I read Catlin Tucker’s (@Catlin_Tucker) blog posts on station rotation models. This post explores the “in-class flip.”

It was only earlier this school year that I began recording mini video lectures. Andrew suggested keeping videos to five minutes or less. To capitalize on the rhyme, I decided on “Mr. E in 3” (minutes) as my video series name.

I did not do any editing or any real tech work. I pulled up the notes and organizers I utilize in class and delivered my mini-lectures. Thus, they were not scripted—though that may work better, I wanted to get them out. My thought was that something was better than nothing. You can see a sample mini-less on semi-colons below:

The others are available from the same channel. I decided to just go for it and post them.

MY PROCESS:
·       Pull up a PDF or Word document of the notes I presented in class.
·       Use Screencastify to record.
·       Upload the videos to Google Drive, then download them.
·       Upload the videos to YouTube.
·       Post the video links in Google Classroom.

VIDEO-LECTURES IN ACTION:
Now, when we are in workshop, students have a resource to turn to for basic questions. This clears me (and my co-teacher in our co-taught sections) to work with students on deeper thinking or style and structure. Students will be less likely to need me to re-teach a concept—beyond their notes and our class examples, they also have access to my lecture again.

FUTURE IDEAS:
·       I would like to add some type of intro: whether I edit or at least say, “Welcome to Mr. E in 3!”
·       I want to get more consistent in my formatting—brief lecture and then follow up with how we talk about or analyze the concepts.
·       Remembering that I can divide one lecture into two smaller ones is helpful (as I did with propaganda technique review). I had not originally considered that option. However, two three-minute videos for a topic is not overwhelming and can also help with more focused review of one particular element of a concept.

This has been another of the many changes I’ve been making to my instruction. So many alterations (standards-based assessment, workshopping, modeling, work habits, community circles) is beginning to feel overwhelming, but I’m trying to take each aspect one step at a time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Constructing Standards-Based Rubrics in the Secondary ELA Classroom

Image
My Instruction and Assessment Philosophy Over the past couple years, I have been reading into standards-based grading and “healthy” grading practices. Along with a variety of blog posts, @TG2Chat/#tg2chat and the #sblchat community, the following resources have assisted me in developing my standards-based assessment (and, in turn, instruction) philosophy: ·          Grading from the Inside Out by Tom Schimmer ( @TomSchimmer ) ·          On Your Mark by Thomas R. Guskey ( @tguskey ) ·          Assessment 3.0 by Mark Barnes ( @markbarnes19 ) ·          Standards-Based Learning in Action by Tom Schimmer ( @TomSchimmer ), Garnet Hillman ( @garnet_hillman ), and Mandy Stalets ( @MandyStalets ) I believe that students must seek learning, not points, and that their grade in my course should be a reflection on that learning. To that end, I allow students to reassess to show mastery, and my workshop approach allows me to coach individual students as they work. I am still
Read more

Students E-mailing Home

Image
Although I only briefly touched on students e-mailing home in my previous post (after my initial post on it back in January), I wanted to expand on how I currently employ student-authored e-mails home. As I noted initially, I was inspired by Catlin Tucker’s (@catlin_tucker) post, “ Students E-mail Their Parents About Missing Work .” Situated in a workshop approach with a move toward standards-based grading, my process has changed a bit since its inception. PURPOSE While I liked the purpose to let students know that parents would be made aware of their work, I quickly realized the exercise was mostly for my students: we would be embarking on some self-reflection. This would be new for some of my students, summarizing and reflecting on their work and learning. Contacting parents became a side-effect of actual class time to pause and reflect. The goal is to reconsider their daily work logs, completed readings and writings, and their plan of action moving forward. I
Read more

Developing Learning Targets for Power Standards

[ Revision note, 8/22/20: Shout-out to Hector Caudillo ( @CaudilloHector ) who suggested I rearrange the learning targets of Standard 2 . They have been sequenced so writing a claim comes first, then formatting proper in-text citations, and then using those citations to analyze the topic at-hand. The text below is edited from my original posting .] Continuing from my previous post , I plan to use the following six guiding/power standards for the 2020-2021 school year: Standard 1 : Reading Nonfiction and Informational Texts Standard 2 : Composing Nonfiction Standard 3 : Reading Fiction and Literature Standard 4 : Composing Fiction Standard 5 : Developing Speaking and Listening Skills Standard 6 : Employing Mechanics, Style, and Vocabulary Even from my post a couple days ago , I have changed a category and added Vocabulary back to Standard 6. I was going to have it integrated throughout, but it makes more sense to have one learning target (subcategory) for it under one Stan
Read more